{"id":249,"date":"2022-08-26T07:20:26","date_gmt":"2022-08-26T07:20:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sprouttoolbox.nuacampus.org\/?page_id=249"},"modified":"2023-02-15T13:03:44","modified_gmt":"2023-02-15T13:03:44","slug":"urban-transition-drivers","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sprouttoolbox.nuacampus.org\/index.php\/understanding-urban-mobility-transition\/urban-transition-drivers\/","title":{"rendered":"Assessing the liveability of a city"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column]

Description <\/span><\/h4><\/div><\/div><\/div>[vc_column_text]The ability of cities to employ and beneficially integrate them into the ecosystem relies on their innovation readiness level, as described in the previous chapter, and on the level of a city\u2019s liveability.<\/p>\n

The liveability component assesses factors that will ease the implementation of innovative mobility solutions. It covers mobility strategies, planning practices, environmental impacts of the mobility system, the affordability, availability and accessibility of mobility services, safety and security issues, the convenience of using mobility services, and user acceptance.<\/p>\n

The following table contains some indicative KPIs for the liveability sub-elements:<\/p>\n\n

\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n City\n Elements <\/th>\n \n Sub-element <\/th>\n \n Indicative\n PIs <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n
\n Innovative\n Governance & Growth <\/td>\n \n L1 <\/td>\n \n Planning\n Investments <\/td>\n \n > Levels of planning process transparency,
> No Master Plans and urban legislation <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
\n Climate and City\n Typology <\/td>\n \n L2 <\/td>\n \n Sustainability <\/td>\n \n > CO\u2082 equivalent or GHG emissions from transport (% of GHG emissions from urban transport)
\n> European Air Quality Index
\n> Noise levels <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
\n Smart & Easily\n accessible <\/td>\n \n L3 <\/td>\n \n Accessibility <\/td>\n \n > Access to mobility services (the ease with which all categories of passengers can use public transport)
\n> Accessibility for vulnerable groups to mobility services (the ease with which vulnerable passengers can use public transport)
\n> Share of inhabitants with mobile internet access (sharing services)\n> SDG - % population within 500 meters of a PT station
\n> No. of Roads, highways, public transport stations <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
\n L4 <\/td>\n \n Affordability <\/td>\n \n > Urban deliveries prices (\u20ac\/package)
\n> Public transport prices
\n> Parking prices
\n> Monthly ticket cost per average income
\n> Cost of a one km taxi ride as a percentage of average income <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
\n L5 <\/td>\n \n Availability <\/td>\n \n > Share of public transport (%)
\n> Share of car transport (%)
\n> Share of micro-mobility (%)
\n> Share of active transport (%)
\n> Share of car-sharing transport <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
\n Safe & Secure <\/td>\n \n L6 <\/td>\n \n Safety and security <\/td>\n \n > Bikes\/E-scooter accidents per 100000 inhabitants
\n> Public transport accidents per 100000 inhabitants
\n> Car transport accidents per 100.000 inhabitants
\n> Share of urban mobility accidents involving on-demand bike\/scooter deliveries
\n> Fatalities including micro-mobility means <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
\n Smart & Innovative Resources and Infra available <\/td>\n \n L7 <\/td>\n \n Efficiency <\/td>\n \n > Share of urban space for public transport
\n> Share of urban space for private\/shared cars
\n> Share of urban space for cycling\/scooter lanes
\n> Share of urban space for pedestrian areas
\n> Number of autonomous\/automated PT services on dedicated lanes <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
\n L8 <\/td>\n \n Convenience <\/td>\n \n > Total passenger trips per day.
\n> The average journey to work in minutes.
\n> The average number of vehicles entering the city daily
\n> Congestion
\n> User trips expected per day <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
\n Innovative People\n & Stakeholders <\/td>\n \n L9 <\/td>\n \n Behaviour and\n smartness <\/td>\n \n > The behaviour of users?\u00a0 E.g., implement access restrictions \/ regulate parking (No parking violations).
\n> Users\u2019 perception of micro-mobility devices.
\n> Users\u2019 perception of biking as dangerous.
\n> User perception of car use as expensive.
\n> Size of the population above minimum user age. <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/table>\n<\/div>